tpo33
The reading presents some theory regarding the purpose of the carved stone balls with the same size, found in many locations in Scotland. The professor, however, challenges the claims and refutes all of them.
First, the author states that they were made to be used as weapons in hunting or fighting. The lecturer, in contrast, asserts that If they were used in fighting or hunting, they would have had signs of cracks, but, all of them are well preserved. they haven't been damaged in wars.
Furthermore, the writer claims that they were as a part of wieghing system for measuring. On the other hand, the speaker says that although they are of the same size, they have made up of different kinds of stone and depend on the which material they are consist of, they have different wieghts. So they couldn't have been used as wieghing measurement.
Finally, the author argues that they had social purposes. The professor, nevertheless, points out that it is implausible based two reason. First, some of them have complex patterns and others are simple. Second, Scotish bury their people with their valuable possesions, whereas none of these stons haven't been found in graves or tames.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-05 | shuya | 80 | view |
| 2020-11-03 | Kawa | 80 | view |
| 2020-08-03 | Hamide | 70 | view |
| 2020-08-02 | fafoolisalar | 80 | view |
| 2020-07-28 | fafoolisalar | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...s, but, all of them are well preserved. they havent been damaged in wars. Furt...
^^^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...t, all of them are well preserved. they havent been damaged in wars. Furthermore...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 256, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'consisted'.
Suggestion: consisted
...d depend on the which material they are consist of, they have different wieghts. So the...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 305, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...f, they have different wieghts. So they couldnt have been used as wieghing measurement....
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have been used as wieghing measurement. Finally, the author argues that they had...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 299, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...possesions, whereas none of these stons havent been found in graves or tames.
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s havent been found in graves or tames.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, well, whereas, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 200.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.995 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41824316395 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 419.366225166 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.8397208279 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.25 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06452816374 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358680498911 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116375443212 0.0996497079465 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881370788274 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203136209102 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610069155884 0.0443174109184 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.