Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.
Information is the significant indicators of country's progress and development. Information-either proven or just referred play a vital role in the society and the nation, to indicate about the different elements of them. So, I am strongly against the author's claim about the referred information should be not trusted because of their possibility to become inaccurate.
Information, which might be just assumed today, can stand as the most important facts for the progress and development in the future. In historical times, there are several such assumptions made by the scientist because of lack of proper facility for experimentation. And there are several examples-they stood as right after few years of accessibility to experimentation and basis for country's technological development. For example; Albert Einstein's theory related to existence of black hole, was not supported in his era but the innovations in technology has led to prove the existence of black hole in 20th century. If such assumption of various scientists is mistrusted, then can we really imagine the present technological development and future aspirations?
Information, usually take a long time to be proved. They cannot be just ignored just after their experimental lacks some authenticity at present. In the field of research and discovery, if we just ignore any information due to lack of their proper authenticity, then it is almost impossible to reach new creation and technology because such technologies are the outcomes of many failures. For example; We are familiar with the hundreds failures of Thomas Alba Edison and if he had just ignored his earlier findings, his light bulb might not be discovered. So, it is very important to carefully pore over the referred assumptions and a careful speculation of errors and findings lead to the discovery.
Some of the information are universal, yet seems cannot be proved. We cannot mistrust some information too because they are fundamental and virtue for us. For example; existence of god and religion is a dubious concept, but majority of people believe on them. God and religion have been along with us since eternity and binds us within the limit of morality since the beginning of human civilization.
Many might argue that information should be just believed on the basis of their authenticity. But the information which they claim to believe today to be right, might be proved wrong tomorrow, because we are yet to find many things to fully discover the nature. So, the term 'authenticity' in the field of science is vague and dynamic. Any information could not be mistrust, instead they should be scrutinized very properly and their possible utility should be stressed
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | gauravwazza12 | 58 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for th 83
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 58
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
... and findings lead to the discovery. Some of the information are universal, yet seems ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: Much might; A good deal of might
...the beginning of human civilization. Many might argue that information should be just b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, really, so, then, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2285.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 434.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26497695853 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11046936067 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518433179724 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 734.4 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0860603121 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.80952381 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2380952381 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285645075314 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890108676453 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857732043722 0.0758088955206 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168233249719 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901530605033 0.0667264976115 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.