In some countries, air travel has become a much cheaper form of transport than in the past. Some people say this is a positive development but other people disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Opinions differ as to whether the current economical air fare over the past time is positive or negative development. As both arguments have their own points, I, like many others, would side with the former one on this matter.
On the negative side, opponents think that cost effective air travel has corrosive effects on the environment. Owing to reduced prices of travel by air (aviation service), individuals are encouraged to fly more which leads to more flights in the air. The toxicant gases emitted from the planes are deleterious for the climate and environment. Even, the fossil fuel, which is consumed by airplanes, is of purest quality, and the planes required an excessive amount of fuel as compared to other form of transportation. During the earlier times, there was no worry of fuel or environment. Thus, for the sake of environmental protection, people consider this tendency as negative.
On the positive side, I believe pocket friendly air travel has opened the doors for people to explore new destinations, work as well as settle overseas. In contrast, in previous time, tourism, because of it's high prices, was bounded to the native territory only. Nowadays travellers can visit to various nations, adapt their language, find the potential employment and get acquainted with a wide variety of cultures. Tourists these days, for instance, not only travel for the tourism but also their purpose is to broaden the horizons about other countries in order to find possibility of work. This ultimately developed the sense of uniformity among people.
In conclusion, despite the drawbacks for environment and limited availability of fossil fuel, I think benefits for individuals to work, settle, and learn about traditions of cheaper air travel than past holds more potential.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-16 | Angrej Singh | 92 | view |
- An increasing number of people now prefer to go shopping in supermarkets rather than small shops and local markets Is this a positive or negative development 92
- You will move to a new city for work. You know some people who live there. Ask them for help finding accommodation.Tell them where you would like to live.Tell them the type of place you are looking for. 70
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Travelling abroad is regarded as a valuable and good activity for young people But some people think it takes too much time and money Discuss both views and give your opinion 57
- Some people say that it is impossible to live comfortably in big cities What problems are faced by the people living in big cities What solutions can be taken to solve those problems 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Opinions differ as to whether the current economical air fare over th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...he current economical air fare over the past time is positive or negative development. As...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the purest'.
Suggestion: of the purest
...uel, which is consumed by airplanes, is of purest quality, and the planes required an exc...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, well, as to, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81348362429 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638888888889 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6213414348 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180214078208 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558586053785 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040292747326 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10428143068 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00713533825802 0.056905535591 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.