Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries. Do you agree or disagree?
It is considered by many people that countries with a high level of economic development should create a system of involving foreign employees, being experienced and knowledgeable workers, from poor countries. I completely agree that is one of the best ways to help people from the third world countries.
Firstly, helping bright employees from poor countries, rich countries develop their own economic. Skilled workers might create new effective ways of running a business with their ideas which were created in their native countries. For example, it is popular for developed countries to buy “brains” in poor countries. The USA and Japan are the main countries where genius employees are coming to improve and install their unique technologies and inventions.
Another point to consider is that allowance to have a job for people from poor countries might help to reduce a level of discrimination all over the world. Involving employees who are from poor countries, rich countries prove that all people have the same rights no matter where they are from. For instance, Poland`s factories appreciate knowledgeable employees from Ukraine giving them the same amount of salaries as for workers who were born in Poland.
To sum up countries with an effective economic should make their job market open for skilled and smart workers who were born in poor countries. A permission to have a job in such rich countries might lead to better economic situation for these countries. In addition, this action would help to solve the problem of discrimination.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g experienced and knowledgeable workers, from poor countries. I completely agree ...
^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s popular for developed countries to buy 'brains' in poor countries. Th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, so, third, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.336 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95507969436 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.9 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.957053859 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.166666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.444652536092 0.244688304435 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165541376294 0.084324248473 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832390723653 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272050357478 0.151304729494 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506130289059 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.