In order to solve traffic problems, government should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation.
What are the advantages of such a solution?
Traffic congestion in metropolitan is the remarkable dilemma. One possible solution to solve this sever problem is to impose heavy taxes on car drivers and make use of this money directly to develop public transport and improve more facilities for people who commute every day
One of the benefit of this solution would be less use of private cars that it would lead to less traffic and thus, decreasing air pollution. If the money that earned from tax of car drivers paid out on public transport improvements, there would surge in demand. This means that by optimizing public transportation, more car drivers would prefer to use it, since they find it a convenient an appropriate way similarly to their car. For example, more trains and buses now are old an depreciated. According to that, most people are likely to not use them. However, high taxes would generate adequate money to dispel these problems and increases the quality and quantity of public transports, such as buses and trains.
Nevertheless, there are merits to this plan, in turn there would be some drawbacks. First and foremost, this situation would be a heavy burden for who are car drivers and must use their private car every day. At present, high taxes put a heavy pressure on most of the people, and so further one would only mean that there would be less money at the end of month. Another disadvantage of this is that it is more likely to be fixed amount, means that it makes the situation only harder for who has not enough money, while the rich could afford it easily. It is not therefore justifiable and fair measure.
To sum up, although there are some disadvantages through offering tax on car drivers, I personally believe that the merits are more prominent.
- Levels of youth crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world. What are the reasons for this, and suggest some solutions. 61
- In order to solve traffic problems, government should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation. What are the advantages of such a solution? 73
- Every country should have a free health service, even if this means that the latest medical treatments may not be available through the service because they are too expensive.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Television has had a significant influence on the cultural of many societies. To what extent would you say that television has positively or negatively affected the cultural development of your society? 56
- Some people think that teenagers should do unpaid work to help society because this will help them to be better individuals and also improve the society a whole. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this proposal? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ilities for people who commute every day One of the benefit of this solution woul...
^^^^
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...mple, more trains and buses now are old an depreciated. According to that, most pe...
^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...s situation would be a heavy burden for who are car drivers and must use their private ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, similarly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81395348837 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59352495141 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528239202658 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.3758939753 49.4020404114 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.461538462 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221829727932 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737318343429 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652033076552 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141813338831 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723756104118 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.