Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think it is a waste of valuable money.
What is your opinion?
It is considered that more investment should be done on saving life forms which are on the brink of extinction while others argue that it is an unnecessary expenditure. In my opinion, I agree that the budget for improving the endangered species population should be increased. However, I also believe that other measures should be taken to prevent species from extinction.
Firstly, a wide range of species are present on Earth and every species is important in its own way. Every animal and plant plays a role in consistently maintaining the ecological balance and food chain. Whenever a species becomes extinct, the food chain is disturbed which shows its impact on the environment which in turn shows its impact on humans. This effect may not be observed immediately but problems will arise in the long-run. For example, if snakes are endangered then the rats in paddy fields destroy the crop which affects us. According to statistics, in 2018 alone, more than 100 species of animals became extinct. Hence, money should be invested to improve the endangered species population.
But, only improving the population is not sufficient. Humans are the primary culprits for the rapid extinction of many animal species and life forms. Prevention is better than cure. Steps should be taken in such a way that no species ever falls into the danger of being extinct. The government plays a crucial role in this. Wildlife sanctuaries should be increased and hunting animals should be reduced. Also, strict rules should be implemented against cutting down forests.
In conclusion, every species is important and it is necessary to improve the spending on preservation. But it is also necessary to change the rules to improve conditions for animals.
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 70
- The line graph shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007. 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a county in 1950 and 2010. 78
- Some people think that the internet has brought people closer together while others think that people and communities have become more isolated.Discuss both sides and give your opinion 61
- Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think it is a waste of valuable money.What is your opinion? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ules to improve conditions for animals.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16140350877 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75505858365 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557894736842 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8244066337 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.4210526316 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78947368421 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222462024018 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693751866542 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716366863633 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134412280336 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768289369889 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.