the first chart below show the number of British visitors to the US and Ameican visitors to the UK from 2011 to 2015. The second chart shows the amount spent by tose visitors in that period
The first bar chart depicts the changes in the number of British visitors to US and American visitors to UK between 2011 and 2015, the second bar chart compares how much spent of those tourists in each countries during this period.
As an overview, it is clearly seen that the rate of British tourists to US was higher than the rate of American tourists to UK over the 5 years period. The amount spent by UK tourists was much more the US visitors at the same time.
According to the first chart, the number of visitors from British come to UK dipped slightly from 2011 to 2013 and hit the low of 2,9 billion people in 2013, but it increased and reached the highest point of 3,5 billion people in the end of this period. While the number of American visitors remained almost stable at nearly 2,8 billion people during the first 2 years. In the third year of this report, this number hit the lowest point of 2 billion people, then it increased gradually to 3,2 billion people in the last year.
In the second chart, an upward trend was seen in how much spent by the UK tourist from 2011 to 2015, it increased slightly over 3-year period, but rose gradually from 4,1 billion dollar to totally 5.8 billion dollar in the end of this period. By contrast, the amount spent by US tourists was nearly flat from 2011 to 2013, but there was some slightly changes in the two years last, it increased from stable amount at about 3 billion dollar to 4 billion dollar. The gap between the UK and US tourists had widened gradually at the end of the period.
- the charts below show the information about land use in four countries 78
- the graph below shows the employment rate of each gender in four countries in 2002 71
- The table below gives information about government expenditure in five sectors relating to domestic policy in Germany Italy and the United Kingdom in 2009 49
- the disadvantage of Internet 61
- critically evaluate whether the cause of delinquent behavior in teenagers is mainly genetic or environmental Analyze the effects this behavior has on society 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 285.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43859649123 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.1604064686 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.39649122807 0.547539520022 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.075379991 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.555555556 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6666666667 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34628826993 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172470590185 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116835046018 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251715883673 0.15604864568 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106568242404 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.85 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.84 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.