Nowadays, distance-learning programs have gained in popularity (those teaching programs that involves the use of written materials, videos, televised lessons and the internet), but some people argue that courses can never be taken as good as those by attending a college or university in person. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Distance-learning programs have gained great popularity with more people finding it very convenient. Some people consider this approach an alternative to attending lectures in person, which, however, cannot effectively replace going to universities. This is true for students. But I think for those who are occupied doing other things such as working online courses are better.
Students on these programs may not get satisfied leaning outcomes. As there is limited interaction between students and lecturers, students might not able to ask questions in time. Consequently, they may misunderstand about some concepts. Besides, assignments or quizzes that the university provides to their students will not be given in distance-learning programs, so students on this program cannot get feedbacks about their academic results.
In addition, students who conduct online study might be distracted by external factors. Unlike face-to-face lectures, online courses are based on the internet, in which students might be affected by unrelated websites and lose concentration. They have to stay focus with no supervision, and if they failed to do so, their efficiency would self-evidently get lower. Therefore, taking an online-program is less effective unless they have strong self-control ability, which is rare on university students
On the other hand, distance-learning programs enable people to study whenever and wherever. This benefits many people who do not have time to go to universities, because they can make their own class schedule. For example, through distance-learning programs, new mothers who still want to receive professional education can take care of their young children meanwhile studying without going to other place. Further to that, those people usually have strong self-motivation and self-discipline, so it is likely for them to stay concentrated during class and learn effectively.
In conclusion, distance-learning programs benefit many people by providing learning resources online who do not have time to attend university courses. Students should go to universities for studying online is likely to be inefficient for them.
- Some people think that all law breakers should be put into prison while others believe that there are better alternatives Discuss both views and give your own opinion 47
- maps 67
- Some parents give their children everything that their children ask for or they want to do. Is this good for children? What could be the consequences for these children when they grow up? 84
- Distance-learning programs have gained great popularity with an increasing number of people finding it more convenient than going to the universities or colleges. Although this approach is an alternative to attending lectures in person, I think it is less 56
- maps edited 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 408, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
... studying without going to other place. Further to that, those people usually have stro...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80564263323 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33256707092 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592476489028 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6898049513 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.941176471 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88235294118 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21347270912 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726071213571 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623611956384 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130409068625 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433849457252 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.