Two years ago, radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call-in advice programs that it broadcast; since that time, its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly. Given WCQP's recent success with call- in advice programming, and citing a nationwide survey indicating that many radio listeners are quite interested in such programs, the station manager of KICK in Medway recommends that KICK include more call-in advice programs in an attempt to gain a larger audience share in its listening area.
The station manager of KICK concedes that increase of more call-in advice program would influx a more number of audience of radio listener. For this recommendation, manager forecast the two years ago condition of radio station WCQP to increase the number of call-in advice programs. Also, cited the nation-wide survey indicating that many of the radio listeners are enthusiates in such types of radio program. However, the claim he has has pt forward seems correct but incomplete and dubious.
The station manger assumes that increase of number of listener--two years ago in WCQP radio station trained will follow in KICK station. However, the increase of number of listener during that period depends upon the different factors. Perhaps, two-years ago, there may be some epidemic or endemic problems arises. It also might be the call-in advice program topic was discussed about the endemic areas--regarding some problems viz; protection from local robbery, health related problems, plant related problems. If above condition exists, then the claims of manger seems baseless unless the evidences related the Medway has put forward.
Secondly, he assumes that condition of Rockville will congruent with the Medway. However, the situation may vary in between these areas. Also, there might be less population in Rockville, and very few population might have be increase in listener; and thus it seems large listener increase significantly. Unless, the manager was not able to give the evidences of exact number of increase listener; his claims was unwarranted; and same condition may not happen in Medway.
In third, the manager assumes that recent survey indicates that many radio listeners were enthusiates in such types of program. Perhaps, he might have done the survey with very few number of respondent. Unless, the number of respondents were sufficient for any survey; then the reliability of survey will be very poor. Unless, the manager, give evidences regarding the evidences of number of respondents, his survey will not hold water.
In conclusion, the contentions provided by the manager seems unwarranted. To bolster his argument, he should give the evidences regarding, what factor might cause increase on call-in advice program in Rockville, and, the condition before two years in Rockville seems congruent ti Medway. To better evaluate the argument, he should give the evidences regarding the number of respondents in survey for it's reliability.
- Parents today are more involved in their children s education than parents were in the past 70
- In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their emplo 85
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development 58
- "Although many people think that the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life areentirely harmless, they in fact, prevent people from developing into truly strong andindependent individuals." 16
- Humans have long been fascinated by elephants, the largest land animal in the modern world. Social animals that live in herds, elephants are native to both Africa and Asia. Their large ears, long trunk, and long life span have made elephants one of the mo 70
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 386 350
No. of Characters: 2018 1500
No. of Different Words: 162 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.432 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.228 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.549 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 167 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 121 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 78 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 49 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.3 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.427 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.8 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.349 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.555 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.175 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 433, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: has
...of radio program. However, the claim he has has pt forward seems correct but incomplete...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 5, Rule ID: MANGER_MANAGER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'station manager'?
Suggestion: station manager
...rrect but incomplete and dubious. The station manger assumes that increase of number of list...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'problems'' or 'problem's'?
Suggestion: problems'; problem's
...about the endemic areas--regarding some problems viz; protection from local robbery, hea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...lle, and very few population might have be increase in listener; and thus it seems...
^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...he might have done the survey with very few number of respondent. Unless, the number of re...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, third, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.6327345309 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 55.5748502994 106% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2084.0 2260.96107784 92% => OK
No of words: 384.0 441.139720559 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42708333333 5.12650576532 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75276060932 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 204.123752495 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458333333333 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 705.55239521 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1638190648 57.8364921388 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.2 119.503703932 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 23.324526521 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.70786347227 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319903979092 0.218282227539 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09852562394 0.0743258471296 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105966515164 0.0701772020484 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188966166716 0.128457276422 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108002576322 0.0628817314937 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.3799401198 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.3550499002 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.5979740519 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 98.500998004 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.