The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007
The line graph compares the total number of tourists to three different regions in a country in Europe from 1987 to 2007.
Overall, it is clear that over the 10 years, all the destinations attracted more visitors. In addition, the coastal location remained its dominant role in terms of the number of tourists.
In 1987, the coast was the most favorite destination with 70 thousand visitors, followed by the lake with exactly 30 thousand. The mountain was least visited, with approximately 10 thousand tourists less than the lake. In the following 10 years, both the coastal destination and the lake witnessed a downward trend in their number of tourists, dropping by 20 thousand and 10 thousand respectively. By contrast, more people chose the mountain as their destination, raising to nearly 40 thousand tourists.
At the end of the period, although both the lake and the coast attracted more travellers, the growth in tn the number of tourists to the coast was more dramatic, as twice as that of the lake. Interestingly, the number of tourists to the mountain went down at exactly 50 thousand, after reaching its peak in 2002.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-16 | honguyenlily | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 73
- In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. SOme people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others believe that the problem can be solved by providing computers and 84
- The bar chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02631578947 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7985997686 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531578947368 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6787728149 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.111111111 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110393350616 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560491603745 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100305936776 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108545316141 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131490380456 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.