the government should impose a fee on drivers who use their vehicles during the rush hour to help cut down on air pollution from exhausting fumes
It is a common belief that drivers should not be charged when using their vehicles at the rush hour, even though it brings many harm to environment. However, I firmly believe that imposing fee would do a lot of benefits because it can cut the number of vehicles drives on the street and protect the environment
To begin with, implementing a rush hour fee would ease the traffic jam, diminishing some of pollution in the atmosphere. Charge will cut the personal cars. Instead, they would opt to use the alternatives means of transportation. This is important because being stuck in traffic also adds appreciably to the emission of pollutants, Moreover, enforcing a fee is not only simple, but it works well. For instance, in some countries, the government introduced this fee several years ago. As a result, the residents started to share their car with each others, walk and public transports as well. Going down on the number of vehicles drives on the street at rush hour make the congestion, accidents in traffic also be down, and pollution levels have gone down as well.
On the top of that, Tax revenue from the rush hour can be used to fund of environmental or social projects. Prohibition can use this charge for improving the green environment. For example, government has been able to plant trees and flower alongside road or improve the jungles after deforestation. Not only the beauty of the landscape has been increased, but the quantity of the living standard has also been improving, especially the air pollution. In effect, rush hour fee can do much to alleviate the polluted air.
To sum up, creating this fee is the best amazing solution for many issues. for these reasons, this charge should be used commonly soon.
- the government should impose a fee on drivers who use their vehicles during the rush hour to help cut down on air pollution from exhausting fumes 73
- Art and music classes should not be mandatory at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- Many people are now spending more and more time travelling to work or school, some people believe that this has negative development while others think there are some benefits. Discuss both view and give your own opinion. 61
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
- The pie chart show the reasons people in Great Britain had for visiting art museums in the years 1990 and 2000 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun harm seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much harm', 'a good deal of harm'.
Suggestion: much harm; a good deal of harm
...at the rush hour, even though it brings many harm to environment. However, I firmly belie...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'alternatives'' or 'alternative's'?
Suggestion: alternatives'; alternative's
...ars. Instead, they would opt to use the alternatives means of transportation. This is import...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
... best amazing solution for many issues. for these reasons, this charge should be us...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.875 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73913785469 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7320526759 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309620418539 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920661956273 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071505899122 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17573805441 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656818124702 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.