In many countries people are living in a "throwaway society" where things are used for a short time and thrown away. What are the causes of this and what problems does it lead to?
In many places around the world, the culture of squandering is really common because things are not used efficiently. This phenomenon happens because of the lack of awareness about the financial security among individuals, furthermore that habit will lead to the pressure on the People's budgets.
A lot of societies follow a collocation of habits full of mistakes such as prodigality, in other words, they do not exploit resources as good as possible. Most of these communities are rich, wherefore ؛ the thinking about savings to secure the future is nihilistic because they think their welfare will not finish. For example ؛ people in GCC countries spend a lot of money on banquet although much of the food of these banquets will be thrown out in the dustbin.
The bad exploitation of resources is a crucial reason for financial problems. Things around should be used as efficient as possible because that will help in enjoying the present and protect the persons in the future. For more clarification, some citizens in developed and rich countries confront that salaries are not enough for the needs, while some people In developing countries can save some of the salaries every month, the secret is the good resource management, In other words, even if the income is limited the person can save as long as good habits in spending are followed.
In conclusion, this article stated that the cause of wasting culture is the lack of consciousness about the importance of finance and that will lead to financial problems for individuals.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-30 | yasir2002011 | 56 | view |
2019-11-30 | yasir2002011 | 67 | view |
2019-07-14 | Toghrul Azizli | 73 | view |
- Some people think that one of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Research has shown that business meetings and training are increasingly taking place online. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 11
- Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea, some think they should be banned. Do you agree or disagree? Give examples of your knowledge. 67
- the charts below show the precentage of water used for different perposes in six area of the world. 56
- Research has shown that business meetings and training are increasingly taking place online. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In many places around the world, the cul...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the pressure on the Peoples budgets. A lot of societies follow a collocation ...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts will be thrown out in the dustbin. The bad exploitation of resources is a c...
^^^
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...people In developing countries can save some of the salaries every month, the secret is the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 589, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s good habits in spending are followed. In conclusion, this article stated t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, really, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1291.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04296875 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77474386047 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546875 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.9884656614 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.444444444 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4444444444 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155844227833 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632117836882 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375025542678 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994828160021 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250440481185 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.