Some people prefer to communicate with their online friend than to socialize with people in their local communities.

Essay topics:

Some people prefer to communicate with their online friend than to socialize with people in their local communities.

The last few decades have seen enormous changes in the way people's lives are affected by the advancement in the technological field. These days, more and more people ate interacting with their virtual friend through social media apps such as facebook, WhatsApp, and IMO rather than to communicate with people, who are in their communities. There are those who say that it can be beneficial for them, who communicate with their online friends, however, others believe that it could be detrimental for them. In this essay, I will discuss the main merit of communicating through internet is convenience, and the main negative aspect is the lack of interpersonal skills.

From an overall perspective, perhaps the most compelling reason why they talk through internet is that it is the easiest way to socialize. This means that If people who live in America, they might also be able to communicate with their friend from the comfort of their own home. unlike in the past, people used to talk with their friend through letters, and it took many days to reply from receiver. Furthermore, they can learn about culture and trait

ion of other countries. This is because when they talk with their foreign friend, they will know about their language, festivals, and most importantly which cuisines are well-renowned in their nations. The importance of online friend should not be underestimated.

Despite these arguments, there are also various cons of less socialization with their communities. One of the disadvantageous aspect of this could be that they develop less interpersonal skills. This means that unless they spend time with their family members, colleagues and friends, they could not be able to communicate effectively, and to deal with challenging situation . This might be harmful for them in the long run. Secondly, they may neglect their studies. This is because they are sure to prefer to interact with their virtual friend than their social responsibilities. If we do not give attention to this issue, this problem could spiral out of control.

To sum up, In today's globalised, urbanised, and the overpopulated world, This is the topic which is very relevant to the contemporary society. The internet, which is one of the most evolutionary invention of modern science, makes our life easier, faster, a sore sophisticated. Taking above into an account, it would appear that there are more merits than demerits between interacting with virtual friend and not communicating with them. If we find the right balance between face to face communication, and online communication, then it would be helpful for us to enhance our minds, and increase our relationships.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-01 Jamil Mohsin 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Unlike
...end from the comfort of their own home. unlike in the past, people used to talk with t...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ion
...hey can learn about culture and trait ion of other countries. This is because whe...
^^^
Line 11, column 375, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
..., and to deal with challenging situation . This might be harmful for them in the l...
^^
Line 15, column 528, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...communication, and online communication, then it would be helpful for us to enhan...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, such as, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 61.0 24.0651302605 253% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2250.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 433.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19630484988 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93829759744 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515011547344 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.0 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 5.43587174349 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 0.809619238477 988% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1731865164 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.142857143 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.619047619 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2380952381 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417693799998 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127376615231 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133479713391 0.0667982634062 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243138509683 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792173303079 0.056905535591 139% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.