The bar chart shows the percentage of food and goods purchased in supermarket
The bar chart indicates how much food and goods purchased in a supermarket in three nations in Europe over a ten-year period, beginning in1998. The data is calibrated in percentage.
Overall, It can clearly be seen that the proportion of food and good which were bought from supermarket grew in all countries. Further, purchases of food and goods uplifted by the greatest margin in country 1 over the period shown.
Looking at the data sets for food in more detail, It is evident that food purchases in country 1 stood at 10% in 1998. This figure climbed rapidly to 4% in 2008, which was the biggest difference on this chart. Similarly, purchases of food in country 2 and country 3 stood at approximately 20%and roughly 5% respectively in 1998, and 30% and 10% respectively in 2008.
Turning to the second chart, It is readily apparent that almost 3% of goods were purchased in country 3 in1998. This value increased marginally to around 10% in 2008, which was the lowest difference between these these two years on this chart. The percentage of goods which were purchased in country 2 in 1998 stood at 40% in1998, as opposed to about 50% in 2008. Finally, goods purchases grew substantially from considerably below than 20% at the beginning of the period in country 1 to 60% at the end of the period, which was the highest percentage on the chart.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- The bar chart shows the percentage of food and goods purchased in supermarket 67
- The bar chart shows the percentage of food and goods purchased in supermarket 67
- Some people believe that as success depends on hard work and determination and others believe that others factors 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of food and goods purchased in supermarket 67
- Some people prefer to communicate with their online friend than to socialize with people in their local communities. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 208, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: these
...which was the lowest difference between these these two years on this chart. The percentage...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, look, second, similarly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77966101695 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72250296737 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7210835857 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.545454545 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347214663026 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139469009673 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907960330042 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232004390525 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620773945725 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.