Some people it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle given the evidence of global climatic change.
Energy can be tagged as one of man's most important resource. It provides the necessary heat required for survival, aids in plant photosynthesis which in turn provides food for man, and is converted into various forms including sound, light, mechanical etc for application in countless measures. Energy as proven by scientists cannot be created nor destroyed but can be converted from one form to another. It is also proven that 10% of energy from the sun alone have not been exhautively harnessed till date let alone the energy from oceans and the wind. Hence, to purport that energy consumption should be minimized is to maintain an overly myopic view. Instead, latent energy from various other dormant sources including radioactive elements, wind, water bodies etc should be vigorously exploited to meet man's demand regardless of the change occurring in the climate.
From the stone age to the information age, demand for energy hasn't declined nor has the climate remained static. Yet, man has always prevailed over nature in scheming a ploy for energy availabilty. Prior to when Michael Faraday discovered the electric bulb, there were lanterns in use fueled by refined hydrocarbons in from of Dual Purpose Kero (DPK). These inventions were developed in response to increasing demand for energy and the need to display tact to climate. Had scientists resorted to energy consumption minimzation, the vision of such inventions would have become irresolute.
In Nigeria, for example, although a developing nation, energy consumption demand is projected to exceed 130Mtoe by 2030. Current energy supply is a far cry to this supply. The bulk of this supply derived from hydrocarbons - oil and natural gas and as well hydro energy hads been insufficient. Nigeria has had it's share of climatic change ranging from desertification of the northern region to drying of the Lake Chad and regional floodings. In response to climatic change and energy demand, Nigeria is developing other sources of energy vigourously. While it may be logical to consider energy consumption reduction, it is indeed not the best reponse to climatic change.
Therefore, energy consumption does not necessarily have to be minimised as a way to respond to climatic change because wind energy, radioactive energy, solar energy, hydro energy hasn't yet been maximised. Those who argue for energy use reduction hold a myopic view because they ignore the possibilty of innovation as a startegy to solve the energy deficit challenge.
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers. 83
- The emergence of the online “blogosphere” and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States. 58
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority. 58
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority. 83
- Some people it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle given the evidence of global climatic change. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
... the information age, demand for energy hasnt declined nor has the climate remained s...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 180, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...tive energy, solar energy, hydro energy hasnt yet been maximised. Those who argue for...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to solve the energy deficit challenge.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2110.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28822055138 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81284553433 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563909774436 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7031647275 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.052631579 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47368421053 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19327560786 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711430652545 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467566659811 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130839104382 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389827126537 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.