The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Well being stems from the precedence people set for themselves. It is largely a function of income, lifestyle, religion, economy, politics and natural occurrences such as earthquakes, tornadoes, etc. In a broad sense, it is more encompassing than what the existing authority decides as so many factors alter it either positively or negatively. Hence, to purport that well being is tied to the ability of citizens to challenge authority is an overly simplistic view.
Income, as a singular factor is sufficient enough to prescribe the lifestyle that one can ever live. Some will argue that it is the government that decides income but in actual fact, the income that one earns is proportional it is one's skill and how much demand that exists for it. Hence, one may not need to challenge any authority to earn more income and improve on one's well being. A man who decides to switch from selling biscuits to selling hand burger will definitely double his income without querying the government.
Indeed, aside income level, the economy of a society influences well being more than anything else. Consider a country like Nigeria where minimum wage was a negligible amount. Although citizens have challenged existing authority in a campaign for an increase, yet well beings have not improved because cost of living has climbed the stairs as well after the minimum wage increase. Inflation as an economic condition results in so much money chasing fewer goods and this does not balance up to improved well being no matter the extent to which government is tackled. It will take an improvement in Gross Domestic Product to cause the required turnaround.
Also, lifestyle is another influencer as far as well being is concerned. A drunkard who earns very little per month will only buy more brings after the government is tackled. This change has not necessarily improved lifestyle but has predisposed the drunkard further to diabetes which will even lead to worse state of health.
Again, do we not want to consider natural disasters? A tornado occurrence can worsen lifestyle no matter to an extent that it may never recuperate again. The victims of such mishaps may have already confronted their government but it sure won't restore their damaged properties.
In conclusion, it is important to admit that when the people challenge government, some negative impact decisions can be reversed but this does not guarantee improved well being. The factors that decide better experience for humans is beyond their government and is largely dependent on the economy, lifestyle, nature and so many other factors.
- The emergence of the online “blogosphere” and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States. 58
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority. 58
- A recent survey on 250 adults show that people who want to increase well being should decrease the amount of time they spend online 61
- Some people it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle given the evidence of global climatic change. 50
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: ACTUAL_EXPERIENCE[1]
Message: Use simply 'fact'.
Suggestion: fact
...e government that decides income but in actual fact, the income that one earns is proportio...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...me that one earns is proportional it is ones skill and how much demand that exists f...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, well, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2198.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 426.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15962441315 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69611541484 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539906103286 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 700.2 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.116187418 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.666666667 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.80952380952 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174501776843 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503637539422 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618621784683 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0869350045441 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610281899909 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.