Encouraging individuals to accommodate in cities despite living in villages are on outskirts is considered optimum way to mitigate the threats of traffic condition as well as transportation all the both a particular notion can ameliorate the situation to some extent this is certainly not the best possible way on account of other approaches available.
To embark with, public mode of transport ranging from buses to trains can be improved by government in order to motivate people to reduce the use of private vehicles. The reason being, cars are one of the major factors increasing traffic condition and masses prefer to travel by these owing to poor condition of public transportation. Consequently, issues of overcrowded routes would be solved immensely when people will switch their attitude from their own motorized vehicles because of amendments in availability and condition of local transportation. Thus, migration from rural areas to urban areas is certainly not required
Apart from this, problem of congestion has been escalating due to less widen roads between suburbs and cities. It is ,therefore, necessary to broaden pathways so that automobiles to not remain stock controls for long hours. For instance, as per a report by Canadian magazine problem of traffic has decreased by 50% in Toronto since the width of road Chinese went out had been increased to fault in comparison to the previous one.
However, the ideology to insist masses to migrate in cities can also be proved beneficial because countless inhabitants of countryside areas travel to metrocities on frequent basis. They do so for jobs as districts are hub of employment sectors. Eventually, if they would move to the towns as per their workplaces they will not required to use their automobiles in large, cars in particular, which in turn leads to less usage of vehicles, and thus negligible traffic.
In conclusion, threatening rate of traffic can be slowed down by promoting urbanization;however, other methods of improvement in public transportation and structure of roads can completely resolve the matter.
- Last weekend you were at your friends house and you forgot your watch somewhere at their house.Write a letter to thank himTell him that you forgot your watch at his house.write other things you want to tell him 78
- People s shopping habits depend more on the age group they belong to rather than other factors To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In some countries private cars are now banned from certain City Centre what are the advantages of such a system and do you feel this is something that most cities should adopt 84
- More and more people no longer read newspapers or watch tv programmes to get their news and instead read online Is this a positive or negative development 69
- You need to do more physical exercise write a letter to your friend asking him to join youin your letterwhy you want to do physical exercise what type of physical exercise you are planning to do why you want your friend to join you 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of public transportation. Consequently, issues of overcrowded routes would be so...
^^
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndments in availability and condition of local transportation. Thus, migration f...
^^
Line 3, column 562, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ondition of local transportation. Thus, migration from rural areas to urban area...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, apart from, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28012048193 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09349373894 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593373493976 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 47.0 20.2975951904 232% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 202.801602055 49.4020404114 411% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 250.428571429 106.682146367 235% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 47.4285714286 20.7667163134 228% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 19.0 7.06120827912 269% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153511305161 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586157262029 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609092530748 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802869577364 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487313658065 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 27.2 13.0946893788 208% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 15.31 50.2224549098 30% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.8 11.3001002004 202% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 29.0 9.78957915832 296% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 20.8 10.1190380762 206% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.