A person’ worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
These days, many people tend to use social status and material properties to define a value of a person, while other kinds of values in terms of pride, kindness and trust seem to be less important. I totally disagree with this idea for a few reasons.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why honour, kindness and trust are still playing an important role in our society. Firstly, humans distinguish with animals and robots because we have hearts, have our own thoughts and see things differently. If those values disappear, we are no longer different from other species. Secondly, I think that we cannot judge other people value by the way they look or the way they wanted to show us, there are so many wealthy people but they are just staying humble and acting like a normal people.
In addition, we are living in an unbiased world, there is no point to say that a value of a person is less important than other aspects. I believe that people are really good at hiding their bad sides and show to others only their good sides. When we look at someone, we cannot decide their values until we show their actions. In my opinion, people who are living under poverty seem to be more sympathize with others than the richer ones because they have learnt to share things such as food or clothing. As a result, they can easily immerse themselves to other people situations.
In conclusion, in this materialistic, while I think that social status and material possessions of a person are important to describe a person’s worth and their position in the society, I do not think that their value can be compared with those things.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-04 | tsln7607 | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-15 | Nowshin Tabassum | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | tuyetsa2004@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | tuyetsa2004@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-14 | ThanhNT | 89 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extend do you agree or disagree?What other measure do you think might be effective? 56
- The tourism industry has grown enormously over the last fifty years and there are few places which are unaffected by it However tourism rarely benefits the countries which tourists visit To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women on different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Nowadays, more and more people decide to have children later in their life. What are the reasons? Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, still, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, by the way, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67820069204 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43734725265 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553633217993 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9359294669 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.666666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.25 7.06120827912 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195665362842 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706455535274 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072198151305 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145491703636 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816092871396 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 50.2224549098 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.