The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011.
The line chart compares the food price index in points and the average oil price per barrel globally from 2000 to 2011. The correlation between these two items was 93.6%.
Looking at the information more detail, we can see that at the beginning of the 21 centuries, the oil price was accounted for around 25 dollars per barrel while the food price index was about 90 points. The oil price fluctuated during the next 8 years and reach a peak at approximately 130 dollars in the middle of 2008 before dropped considerably to hit a low at 40 dollars in early 2009. Then increased significantly again over the period shown.
Similarly, the food price gradually increased and peaked at just over 220 in the 2008s. After that, there was a sudden fell and hit a low point at 140 before rose dramatically by the year 2011.
Overall, it is clear that the price changes between food and oil are strongly connected, although in some period the changed oil price was more rapid.
- In some countries the government has tried to reduce traffic For instance they imposed a congestion tax during rush hour Do you think this development is positive or negative 79
- the two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Some people think that it is more important to plant more trees in open area which in towns and cities than build more housing To what extent do agree or disagree 80
- Some people regard the increasing business and cultural contact between countries as a positive development. Others, however, feel these leading to loss of national identities. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- News media has become more influential in people's lives. Others believe it is a negative development. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, similarly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72674418605 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47911776209 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604651162791 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6331644498 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.625 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304374636954 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131755097787 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123177283026 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217222892995 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115209708777 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.