The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012.
The line graph shows the proportions of woman members of parliament in 5 different countries in Europe between 2000 and 2012.
It is clear that the percentages of woman in those countries namely took part in parliament have increased almost all the time surveyed. Furthermore, UK has seen the fastest raise in this figure.
In 2000, the percentage of female in Germany 's parliament was highest, at about 33 percent. The figures for Italy and France were lower, stand by over 25 percent. Belgium and UK saw the lowest proportions of parliament female member, which accounted for approximately 17 percent and 3 percent respectively.
The period from 2000 to 2012 saw the highest raise in the proportion of UK female joined parliament, by about 20 percent to approximately 23 percent, which equal to the figure of Belgium. Over the same period, the figures for France and Germany climbed slowly, to about 32 percent and 38 percent respectively. Meanwhile, Italy saw a significant increase in the proportion of female members in parliament, which overcame figure of Germany to nearly 40 percent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | hungnguyen2712 | 67 | view |
- There is no need to complete an education beyond a primary school level Do you agree or not 67
- In countries where there is high unemployment most pupils should be offered only primary education There is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- There is no need to complete an education beyond a primary school level Do you agree or not 67
- International travel is becoming cheaper and cheaper and more countries are now opening their doors to foreign visitors Do you think that the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 78
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 26.3917525773 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.85567010309 207% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 937.175257732 99% => OK
No of words: 180.0 206.0 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15 4.54256449028 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93309658135 2.54303337028 115% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 127.690721649 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.622605031667 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 290.88556701 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.4794317352 44.8134815571 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 76.5299724578 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 16.8248392259 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 4.34317383033 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256246618623 0.216113520407 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119329968607 0.0766984524023 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102573313132 0.0603063233224 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182017101546 0.12726935374 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818969040911 0.0580467560999 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 8.37731958763 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 70.7449484536 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 8.71597938144 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 7.59969072165 109% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 41.2886597938 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 8.62886597938 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.