In the past, museums stored information about culture and history. However, nowadays this information can be found through the Internet, so there is no need for museums. Do you agree or disagree with this view?.
It is sometimes suggested that the network have clearly materials about museums, thus lack of humans are not prefer visit this structure with culture and own history. I strongly disagree that galleries are no needed to participate for people. Firstly, this essay will discuss the possible gains after visited museum, and secondly, it will analyze potential harmful of online sources for storage.
The primary reason why public must go to museum is that they can change their vision about environment by the seeing some materials in real life. This is because in real life we fully shipped into the museum’s atmosphere, where we might touch a bones of t-rex or we can read the old book, which wrote by the person in the past. As a result society might provide this time with benefits, because it is a golden opportunity to recognize the old environment habits or they will make sure that dinosaurs are being real in the past. A prime example is art center that names “Foundation”, it has a statue of pirates and people may read about life in the 17th century.
Another point to consider is that web-sites with the information about institutions are risky to being valid. The reason for this is that not all galleries may have the truest studies about the past time due to their mistakes from some materials. As a consequence lack of humans may remember a no need information about the previous centuries, thus it may bring some bad emotions about the galleries. For instance, university of Harvard was identified that 75 per cent of museums have a valid data about the past.
In conclusion, I am firmly convinced that people should participate the academies for unbelievable feelings. This is due to the fact that public may touch some dinosaur’s bones with their hands and the web versions of gallery’s is not only true.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | Bakhtiyar1 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | Bakhtiyar1 | 78 | view |
- In the past, museums stored information about culture and history. However, nowadays this information can be found through the Internet, so there is no need for museums. Do you agree or disagree with this view?. 78
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some parents think it is good to give their children mobile phones, while others disagree. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'preferred'.
Suggestion: preferred
...ut museums, thus lack of humans are not prefer visit this structure with culture and o...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a bone' or simply 'bones'?
Suggestion: a bone; bones
...apos;s atmosphere, where we might touch a bones of t-rex or we can read the old book, w...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...s may have the truest studies about the past time due to their mistakes from some materia...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92651757188 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85153748226 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552715654952 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4135627979 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.615384615 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291096597879 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993677220219 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414702993374 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164173756022 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671182886395 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.