Do you agree or disagree with a following statement?
In the past people ate food that was better for their health than day do today
Researching in a lifestyle of people who lived in the past cause we can reach pieces of good information about kinds of foods that they ate at that time. Some experts believe that people that lived in the last years had better nutrition than people who live now. Others stand on the other side of the continuum, believing that the modern lifestyle makes conditions for people can eat healthier food. As far as I am concerned, I agree with the former perspective. The reasons to substantiate my viewpoint are elaborated upon hereunder.
To begin with, good meals should have fresh content because these foods cause the digestive system has an easier function in a digestion process. In the past, people ate foods like clean vegetables, fresh beef, dairy productions, etc. Usually, these foods prepared hours before eating, but nowadays people use frozen or semi-prepared foods which have a bad negative on their health. The meals have a lot of preservatives and these materials cause people can keep them in a freezer for a long time. As you know frozen foods make diseases that they can damage to the liver. One of the diseases which emerge by eating frozen food is fatty liver, that has dreadful results on a body. Statistics show that the mortality rate is increasing, and nutritionists announce that this growing makes by frigid foods. This condition compared to the past is fearful, because in the past people died for deficiency of medical facilities not for eating foods.
Moreover, in the past people ate their food slowly and believed that this work cause they have a better sleeping. Their idea was true because a few years ago I read an article that was published by researchers which it explained gradually chewing has a more benefit than quickly eating, but nowadays people are busy and they cannot eat their food without haste because they want to do swiftly their assignments. This way creates problems for them and probably they lose their health. As you can see, old people had a superior lifestyle than now.
In conclusion, taking all the reasons and examples into account, I believe that we can find healthy lifestyle in the past people because they could eat up to date foods and they swallow their foods with calmness, therefore they had a normal body.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture. Being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. Fires in Yellowstone park 80
- sdasd 3
- TPO 41Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they change the specific arguments presented in the reading passage.making sever rules for recycling of coal ash. 83
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a large city. Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 499, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...keep them in a freezer for a long time. As you know frozen foods make diseases tha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, you know, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88144329897 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52070288477 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528350515464 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1109057298 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.222222222 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313806330449 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963552114353 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053518725051 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192783849244 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654737574582 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.