Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.
Truth is undeniably a crucial part which affects human life. A controversial argument that is often raised regarding this topic is whether to always tell the truth in a relationship or not. If I were obliged to choose, I would absolutely agree with telling the truth in every relationship for several reasons, on a few of which I elaborate subsequently.
The first imperative reason is that all lies we may say or anything we conceal will finally become manifest. The result of this phenomenon cannot be good for our reputation or friendship. My personal experience can shed light on this issue. I had a friend named Marry when I was at university. We both were talented students and tried our best to achieve full marks in every exam. In the last year of our university, I fill out a form for merit base students who can study master without any exam for entrance. I asked about her rank and her GPA and she said that she will not register and she is ashamed of her grade due to the low marks from the first year. I had a very good relationship with one of the professors who was the head of the talented student department. One day he saw me in the hallway and congratulated me for being accepted as a merit base student. I thanked him and asked him if there was any other person who accepted. His answer was really shocking for me when he mentioned Marry as one of them. I was happy for her but I could not understand why she told such a foolish lie to me. This was the reason I abandon her and other friends of hers were upset for her lies and did not continue their friendship.
The second reason corroborating my view is that truth is what makes reliability so we can count on each other which is what all people look for in a healthy relationship. My own experience is a compelling example of this. A few months ago, I got out of a relationship with my boyfriend. I understood that he lies to me about his relations with another girl. We had a habit to call each other whenever we could. Every time I called him and he was out he said that he is out with one of the boys in the class. One day, I saw him walking with a girl but he did not notice me. I called him on the phone to see if he is going to lie to me or not. Unfortunately, he lied and I understand that he is not the one I can count on. It broke my heart, but I could not stand living with a man who lies to me.
To make the long story short, it is established beyond doubt that telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship because not only will the lie be revealed but also no one can count on the person who lies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Charles William | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Md Lutfor Rahman | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | mucahit11 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | S M Naimul Mamun | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | mirelly.meireles | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In high schools and colleges, it is more desirable for a group project to be evaluated the same regardless of the individual students’ performances. 76
- If you could meet a famous entertainer or athlete who would that be and why Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 87
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. 70
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...one can count on the person who lies.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, look, may, really, regarding, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 87.0 43.0788530466 202% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2134.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 504.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.23412698413 4.8611393121 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57832396571 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464285714286 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.9 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6388798408 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.037037037 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.62962962963 5.45110844103 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127432064227 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365505379243 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545198567115 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123717140346 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802149285767 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 11.7677419355 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 58.1214874552 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.25 10.9000537634 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.72 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.