The chart below show the percentage of water use by different sectors in sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007.
The presented pie charts depict information about how much water was consumed by various sectors classified into building industry, food industry, service industry, manufacturing and household use in Sydney, Australia over two separate years.
At first glance, it is immediately obvious that while the shares of water usage in terms of two sectors experienced rises, there were declines in the remaining three. Moreover, food industry contributed the largest proportion of consumed water throughout the survey, whereas building industry had the smallest share.
When observing data in more detail, water usage to food industry accounted for the most significant proportion of total water with standing at 48% in 1997 and decreased slightly to reach the point of 41% in 2007. In comparison, the percentage of water for service industry was responsible for less than a fifth of all water use in 1997, but this share went up substantially by a quarter over the course of a decade.
Turning to rest of description, the share of industry sector in water usage was initially as high as that of domestic use, 15%, but while the former steadily dropped by 11%, the latter witnessed a rise reaching just over a fifth. The contribution of building industry had fallen minimally from 5% to 2%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Drragkloha | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | khoavodoj | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | Lucy_067 | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | BangLangTim | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U.S. from 1960 to 2011 78
- The chart below compares levels of recycling, as well as some less environmentally friendly forms of waste management, in fifteen European countries. 78
- The chart below gives information about Someland s main exports in 2005 2015 and future projections for 2025 71
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22488038278 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80870617615 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612440191388 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.8978625906 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.0 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8571428571 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231927312058 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943620091619 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588594838349 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129458552241 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518490880069 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.