Children in many countries are eating more fast food and convenience snacks. Why are children doing this and how serious are the consequences?
Nowadays along with the growth of modern lifestyle is the rapidly emerging of fast-food franchises. As a result, people are argued that these kinds of food are being overconsumption by children throughout the world. This tendency resulted from numerous reasons and its consequences are no laughing matter
On the one hand, there is a variety of explanations for this hassle. First of all, is the easy availability of junk food. These days people can find quick-lunch counters in every corner of the world. It seems to be shreds of evidence that fast food joints such as KFC or Burger King are becoming a familiar place for not only the hectic adult but also teenagers and kids due to the lower price when compared to traditional restaurants. Secondly, snack food reportedly had an addictive aroma. Although having inadequate sanitation, ready meals still popular among children under its ingredients that may stimulate the gustation. Casein, which is often referred to as the nicotine of fast food, is a good case in point. Last but not least is the modern parents' negligence in preparing a healthy diet for their children. In appears to be true that many parents always up to their ears and they choose fast food to replace traditional meals. Inevitably, the more these foods are being consumed, the more children will not want to eat traditional foods
Consequently, the excessive consumption of fast food brings many negative effects. In the first place, it is responsible for a lot of disorders. Obesity, stroke or diabetes, to mention but a few. Furthermore, eating takeaway food for a long time may cause a serious lack of vital nutrient a person need for comprehensive development. The second result is the decline in memory and cognitive functions. Fast foods like bacon burgers, some fried foods, and milkshakes are often high in saturated fats which may impair memory speed and flexibility and prospective memory. Finally, eating processed food may loosen family bonding since there is no mealtime. Children may suffer from anxiety, trembling, confusion and fatigue when they had to leave their parent arms too soon
Overall, increased in junk food consumption caused by the easy availability of joints, addictive taste, and parents' negligence and it can result in both mental and physical diseases and may loosen the family bonding
- Many doctors say that people in today s world do not do enough physical exercise What do you think are the causes of this What solutions are there to this problem 84
- Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies factories and their employees to the countryside Do you agree or disagree 84
- Advertisements are becoming more more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 11
- The Pie chart gives information about the country of birth of people living in Australia and the table shows where people born in these countries live 82
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement High school students should wear uniforms to schools 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 752, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parents'' or 'parent's'?
Suggestion: parents'; parent's
...point. Last but not least is the modern parents negligence in preparing a healthy diet ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 899, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to fast'
Suggestion: to fast
...always up to their ears and they choose fast food to replace traditional meals. Inev...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, such as, as a result, first of all, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1974.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.140625 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78230317139 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588541666667 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.9057741574 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.894736842 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2105263158 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.68421052632 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255919574582 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698003249809 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636162623321 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1423320171 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728943394973 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.