The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.
The two maps illustrate the current state of town called Islip as well as what kind of advancements is planned for future.
At first glance, it is obvious that, the city centre will undergo perceptible alterations, there will be extensive developments with regards to construction of buildings, roads and parking space in the center of town, and the number of residents will also increase significantly.
According to the current map, the town center is developed around a main road, which stretches from the west to the east. There are many shops to the north and to the south of the road. Whilst it is mainly consisted of the countryside in the north, a big area is occupied by housing in the south. This area is limited by a park in the east and a school in the south-west. Both of these structures are connected to the main road by side roads.
Moving on to the predictions, a circular road that goes around the city center attracts attention. This road expected to be built is a dual carriageway. The middle part of the main road is projected to be pedestrianized. Although the southern part of Islip is not designated to see big changes other than a shrink in the size of the park to provide space for new houses, there are many changes planned for the northern part. Shops in this part will be demolished and a shopping centre and a housing area will be introduced. A bus station and a parking area are also planned to be built to the west and the east of the shopping centre, respectively
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | wondertran | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | sujith358 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | sujith358 | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | sujith358 | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | Sagar Gurung | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 84
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 73
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U.S. from 1960 to 2011 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries. 73
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, well, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 269.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63197026022 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73926997675 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490706319703 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 373.5 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7231568279 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8461538462 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13553158416 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457835377459 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754564454493 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110284615278 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0972741751963 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.