TED for shrimp boats
The reading presents some evidence which indicate that TED (turtle excluder device) is not a rational innovation to prevent the endangered sea tutle species from being catched by the shrimpers' nets. The professor, however, challenges the claims made by the article and refutes them all.
First, the author argues that it is very rare that turtles get trapped and on averege, only one shrimp boat accidentally catches one turtle. In addition, TED cause many shrimps escape. In contrast, the lecturer asserts that due to the limited number of these endangered speicies, this amount of turtle is a high percentage.
Furthermore, the writer states that there are many effective methods which can be used instead of TEDs. One method that can be used is shortening the time limit of being the nets under water. The speaker, on the other hand, contends that monitoring thousands of boats is implausible. It is more reasonable to use TED than the afformentioned method.
Finally, the passage says that some larger turtle species cannot fit through the escape passage of standarded TED. Conversely, the lecturer posits that TED can be designed with a changeable escape passage.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, so, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 992.0 1373.03311258 72% => OK
No of words: 190.0 270.72406181 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22105263158 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6506885114 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.657894736842 0.540411800872 122% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 419.366225166 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2290368969 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.7 7.06452816374 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195470055606 0.272083759551 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813040930019 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753123170213 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106887997908 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576565309133 0.0443174109184 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.