tpo 34-2
The reading presents some possible reasons for the extinction of Steller's sea cow, a clossol marine animal discovered by Steller, an European naturalist. The professor, however, challenges all the claims made in the article and refutes them.
First, the author states that the overhunting by native Siberian people attributes to the animal extinction. The lecturer, in contrast, disagrees with this statement in two point. First, each of the sea cows were nine meter long and weighs ten tones, so people could have one sea cow for a long time as a source of food. Second, the population of that area weren't too large to hunt many animals.
Furthermore, the writer suggests that due to the decrease of the population of Kelp, the ecosystem is the reason for extinction of sea cows. On the other hand, the speaker contends that if a severe situation had happened to Kelp,there should have been a decline in other marine animals' population too. Nevertheless there is nothing reported regarding to this.
Finally, the author asserts that European fur traders is the main cause of this extinction. Conversely, the lecturer argues that there was decline in the sea cows population hundereds of years preceding European arrival, because the shortage of sea cows is reported by traders who have observed it during fishing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ol marine animal discovered by Steller, an European naturalist. The professor, how...
^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'meter' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'meters'.
Suggestion: meters
.... First, each of the sea cows were nine meter long and weighs ten tones, so people co...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...od. Second, the population of that area werent too large to hunt many animals. ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... werent too large to hunt many animals. Furthermore, the writer suggests that du...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 229, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
... a severe situation had happened to Kelp,there should have been a decline in other mar...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 279, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...uld have been a decline in other marine animals population too. Nevertheless there is n...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 303, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...in other marine animals population too. Nevertheless there is nothing reported regarding to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 159, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cows'' or 'cow's'?
Suggestion: cows'; cow's
...rgues that there was decline in the sea cows population hundereds of years preceding...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1114.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15740740741 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69156330625 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.016613909 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.272727273 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4545454545 7.06452816374 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.532210842834 0.272083759551 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151307856262 0.0996497079465 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118829759447 0.0662205650399 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283361536074 0.162205337803 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873617298873 0.0443174109184 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.