average yearly spending by Americans on mobile and landline phone services
The line graph compares average yearly spending by Americans on mobile and landline phone services from 2001 to 2010.
It is clear that spending on landline phones fell steadily over the 10-year period, while mobile phone expenditure rose quickly. The year 2006 marks the point at which expenditure on mobile services overtook that for residential phone services.
In 2001, US consumers spent an average of nearly $700 on residential phone services, compared to only around $200 on cell phone services. Over the following five years, average yearly spending on landlines dropped by nearly $200. By contrast, expenditure on mobiles rose by approximately $300.
In the year 2006, the average American paid out the same amount of money on both types of phone service, spending just over $500 on each. By 2010, expenditure on mobile phones had reached around $750, while the figure for spending on residential services had fallen to just over half this amount.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-04-11 | HATHUYBINH | 67 | view |
2022-03-26 | Lia Nguyen | view | |
2020-06-12 | karanbirsinghrandhawa | 56 | view |
2019-12-22 | Spring2019 | 84 | view |
2019-05-29 | ludovicag | 70 | view |
- The graph below gives information about the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad between 1983 to 1992 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant Write at least 150 words 85
- The chart below shows possible causes and results of urban drift where large numbers of people move from rural to urban areas Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Internet users 80
- The table presents the subways systems in 6 major countries in terms of opening date, length of route, and passenger per annum in millions.(re-write) 70
- The graph below shows the percentage change in the number of international students graduating from universities in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006 45
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 155 200
No. of Characters: 776 1000
No. of Different Words: 86 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.528 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.006 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.518 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 58 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 41 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 31 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 12 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.375 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.476 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.25 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.48 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.717 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.144 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4