average yearly spending by Americans on mobile and landline phone services
The line graph compares average yearly spending by Americans on mobile and landline phone services from 2001 to 2010.
It is clear that spending on landline phones fell steadily over the 10-year period, while mobile phone expenditure rose quickly. The year 2006 marks the point at which expenditure on mobile services overtook that for residential phone services.
In 2001, US consumers spent an average of nearly $700 on residential phone services, compared to only around $200 on cell phone services. Over the following five years, average yearly spending on landlines dropped by nearly $200. By contrast, expenditure on mobiles rose by approximately $300.
In the year 2006, the average American paid out the same amount of money on both types of phone service, spending just over $500 on each. By 2010, expenditure on mobile phones had reached around $750, while the figure for spending on residential services had fallen to just over half this amount.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-04-11 | HATHUYBINH | 67 | view |
2022-03-26 | Lia Nguyen | view | |
2020-06-12 | karanbirsinghrandhawa | 56 | view |
2019-12-22 | Spring2019 | 84 | view |
2019-05-29 | ludovicag | 70 | view |
- The graph below shows the average growth in domestic products in wealthy countries countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not 78
- The chart and table show the number of fishers in millions for different regions between 1970, 1980 and 2000, and the world's top ten exporters of fish in 2000. 92
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 80
- In some countries young people have little leisure time and are under a lot of pressure to work hard in their studies What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 90
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 55
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 155 200
No. of Characters: 776 1000
No. of Different Words: 86 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.528 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.006 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.518 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 58 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 41 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 31 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 12 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.375 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.476 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.25 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.48 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.717 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.144 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4