The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The table illustrates five distinct nations in terms of the consumption of consumers on various categories in the year 2002.
It is clear that Food/Drinks/Tobacco was spent on the most in all countries. By contrast, these nations allocated the least to Leisure/Education at the same time.
Regarding Food/Drinks/Tobacco, the proportion of Turkey was highest at 32.14%, followed by that of Ireland at 28.91%. In comparison, the figure for other nations was around 17%.
It is also noticeable that Clothing/Footwear made up 9% of consumers’ budget in Italy, which was higher than other countries. Ireland, Spain and Turkey expended approximately 6.5% of their expenditure on Clothing/Footwear, compared to only 5.4% of Sweden.
With regard to Leisure/Education, Turkey had the highest percentage in this category at 4.35%. Meanwhile, the figures in Italy and Sweden were nearly the same, at around 3.2%. While the proportions of the two remaining nations, Ireland and Spain, were 3.2% and 1.98% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Noah1997 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | shayma | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | phungnguyen1611 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
- the production of electricity from different sources in 4 nations 67
- The maps show the changes of Shalton village from 1910 and 2010. 84
- The pie charts illustrate the result of a research in terms of the cultural and leisure activities that boys and girls take part in. 73
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the Internet and they can study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Pie charts 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, so, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67741935484 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.7851563969 2.65546596893 143% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.651612903226 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.536354858 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.0 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0518035708168 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0219413483782 0.103423049105 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551585117851 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0417946058924 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719492219277 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.