The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of households owning and renting accommodation in england and wales from 1918 to 2011.
Overall, there were 2 opposite trends in the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in england and wales over the period of 93 years. In 1971, the figures of households owning and renting accommodation were the same.
In 1918, nearly 80% of households in rented accommodation, which was higher than that of households in owning with just over 20%. while the proportion of households in owned accommodation in england and wales tended to increase, the figure for households in rented accommodation decreased. In 1971, they reached equal proportion, at 50%.
From 1971 onwards, households in rented and owned accommodation in england and wales continued to remain their opposite trends. Finally,in 2011, the percentage of household renting accommodation dropped to 36% while that of households owning accommodation was approximately double with 64%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | thanhthanh211 | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | Liam | 67 | view |
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people believe that crime is a result of social problems and poverty, others think that crime is a result of bad person’s nature. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- The table and pie chart shows the number of research students in Australian universities in 2001 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 67
- Some people think that men and women have different qualities. Therefore, some certain jobs suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 78
- The pie charts below show the avarage household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gland and wales from 1918 to 2011. Overall, there were 2 opposite trends in...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nting accommodation were the same. In 1918, nearly 80% of households in ren...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 131, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ouseholds in owning with just over 20%. while the proportion of households in owned a...
^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reached equal proportion, at 50%. From 1971 onwards, households in rented ...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 86, Rule ID: CONTINUE_TO_REMAIN[1]
Message: Use simply 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...wned accommodation in england and wales continued to remain their opposite trends. Finally,in 2011,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 136, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...to remain their opposite trends. Finally,in 2011, the percentage of household renti...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72549019608 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23606645564 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 72.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3578555996 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.542695179751 0.215688989381 252% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.284926325859 0.103423049105 275% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141280828199 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.41157976883 0.15604864568 264% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746821439279 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 11.4140731707 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.