More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses. Why do they do that? Who benefit more from this, the community or these young people.
It is true that the voluntary work of the young in impoverished nations has become an increasingly widespread concern. The main one has resulted from this tendency and both individuals and these societies gain equal benefits.
The phenomenon can be attributed to the principal reason. Participating in voluntary works is considered as a compulsory way to enhance the resume of youngsters in some developed countries. Take America as a prime example for offering a wide range of extra-curricular activities, especially voluntary projects to help students have opportunities to find a decent job in their future since most enterprises require employees to master essential skills which gain through getting involved in social activities such as teaching or providing the accommodation for the poor. As a result, the young allocated a short-term to take part in these work to obtain valuable experience for themselves which is benefits for their later career and their life as well. Furthermore, to let off some steam after their hard work, some people participate in helping impoverished people.
Not only youngsters who spend their time in the pooer society by taking part in voluntary institutions but also these communities benefit from this particular practice. First, By helping the poor, it helps young people share sympathy with others which brings them pleasure and happiness in their life. Around 90 percent of volunteers satisfied and felt happy about their work after obtaining valuable experience through unpaid activities in their spare time in a recent study, leading to a significant increase in the rate of voluntary participants. Second, the local society has chance to heighten their social living standards, even though the impact of these voluntary projects is small and temporary.
In conclusion, reasons related to the improvement of curriculum vitae of the young lead to its popularity in many wealthy countries. It seems that both volunteers and the area that receive help can gain some certain values.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-21 | phanhhh | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-19 | vivitoben | 82 | view |
| 2021-06-29 | vothihuongdungvn | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-29 | vothihuongdungvn | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Dongvo | 87 | view |
- Topic: Many believe that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only governments and big companies can make a difference. Agree or Disagree? 78
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Topic: Many believe that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only governments and big companies can make a difference. Agree or Disagree? 89
- Topic: Many believe that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only governments and big companies can make a difference. Agree or Disagree? 78
- Many believe that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only governments and big companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1712.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38364779874 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97744776711 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59748427673 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.7074577491 49.4020404114 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.692307692 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4615384615 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145647101899 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530463912068 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475180383647 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892326643098 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316799336638 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.