The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010.
The bar chart compares six different nations, namely Qatar, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait, UAE in terms of the estimated amount of produced oil over the course of 20 years starting from 1990.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that five out of the six countries increased while the capacity of produced oil in Qatar remained fairly unchanged.
In 1990, the daily number of produced oil barrels in Saudi Arabia was the highest at more than 8.5 million, followed by Iran with 3 million barrels. After 20 years, the oil production quantity of Saudi Arabia rose dramatically to 14.5 million barrels per day, that of Iran only experienced a slight growth to over 4 million barrels.
In comparison, UAE, Iraq and Kuwait had a similar amount of made oil around 2 million barrels every day. Surprisingly, all three nations climbed slightly at approximately 3.8, 4 and 3.5 million barrels in 2010. Meanwhile, the figures for Qatar was only 0.4 million and stayed constantly at that level during the twenty years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | lehonganh | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-31 | hin07 | 73 | view |
- The bar chart shows the number of cars per 1000 people in 5 European countries in 3 years compared with the European average 73
- There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home This is because computer technology is more accessible and cheaper Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- The pie chart below shows information about where coffee is produced consumed and where is profit goes 89
- Some people believe that planning for the future is a waste of time because they think that focusing on the present is more important To what do you extent agree or disagree 67
- The table below gives information about the population in Australia and Malaysia in 1980 and 2002 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97093023256 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58895290084 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656976744186 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6775231561 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.142857143 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15286790147 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069957465966 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376473781665 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956952285062 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339385499675 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.