Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
People have different views about following different cultures in travel. Some people reckon that visitors should follow local customs of the country they visit whereas the opponents of this idea believe that these countries should welcome those cultural differences from their visitors. From my point of view, I agree with the former view, even though the other one also shows some positive aspects.
On the one hand, host country can receive huge benefits of welcoming cultural distinctions from other countries. First, in this time of globalization, opening to obtain more special cultural beauty can help the host country enrich their culture. It is also the best way to develop tourism industry and the national economy. For example, if women visit Egypt, they don’t have to cover their faces or hair like most Egyptian women because Egyptians understand and respect various cultures. And obviously, the host country itself will get respect and love of visitors in all over the world.
On the other hand, I truly believe that tourists should observe local customs and behaviour for many reasons. Firstly, respecting local culture is a way to express your love with the country and people where you visit. Secondly, when you behaviour like a native inhabitants you can learn many special things, get a lot of real experiments and enlarge you knowledge especially about cultural identity. For example, Japanese meal has variety of regulations which you should follow to get fascinating insight into their subculture. Furthermore, , following the social behaviours enables visitor avoid unexpected judgements of people in the host country and adopt tradition more easily.
In conclusion, I believe that it could be beneficial for visitors to get exposed to different cultures and customs. However, tourist destinations should be opened to the cultural diversity of its newcomers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-21 | ngthanh1220@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | qminh. | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | qminh. | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | Lê Quỳnh Mai | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-06 | niloya | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 78
- TOPIC Some people argue that the purpose of zoos is only to entertain people What do you think What other purposes of zoos 77
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your ans 79
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities. 78
- Some people believe that it is good for students to have the same teacher for several years Others think students benefit more from having new teachers each year Which do you think is better Give specific reasons to support your opinion 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 263, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'inhabitant'?
Suggestion: inhabitant
...ondly, when you behaviour like a native inhabitants you can learn many special things, get ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 542, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ight into their subculture. Furthermore, , following the social behaviours enables...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, for example, in conclusion, you know, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43243243243 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63808527709 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584459459459 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8202767485 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.2 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402725406328 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128484539009 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862712413447 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234386917406 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962933374582 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.