Some people think that countries should limit the amount of food that they import and mainly eat products from their own country.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Today’s globalized world, countries provide many products to their citizens by importing them. The opinion exists that governments should implement a policy to restrict import of some eat products from other countries. This essay will discuss why limiting of import these products has a crucial importance and effect on countries.
In general, there are several reasons why people believe that import of some basic products should be limited. The primary argument supporting this idea is that economy could be affected. If countries bought these products in a huge amount from other countries, local producers, such as farmers, food companies, would lose money and it is likely that they stop running their business. The result of this is that employees will lose their jobs, which in turn leads to social and economic issues on local people’s life. Secondly, some people think that eat products from other countries are not safe, reliable and healthy for them. If these products were not controlled properly by the government, people could develop many catastrophic diseases. Another argument is that domestic products are usually cheaper and easy to reach them.
Despite these arguments, imported food products can offer a competitive market so people would have more options. The result of this might be that these products could be sold much more cheaper , which is beneficial for local people.
In conclusion, a government policy that restriction in import of food products has an wide range effect on country’s economy and people’s life. I think that this policy would both be better for economy and people’s health.
- Levels of youth crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world.What are the reasons for this, and suggest some solutions. 78
- In most countries multinational companies and their products are becoming more and more important.This trend is seriously damaging our quality of life.Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money.Discuss both t 56
- New technologies provided machines which replaced workers to do certain physical jobs and tasks. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 11
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today.What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 182, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'cheaper' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: cheaper
... that these products could be sold much more cheaper , which is beneficial for local people....
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 194, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...products could be sold much more cheaper , which is beneficial for local people. ...
^^
Line 13, column 84, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...triction in import of food products has an wide range effect on country's eco...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, secondly, so, i think, in conclusion, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42857142857 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70839971091 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548262548263 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5701345473 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.428571429 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287452597613 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10924123677 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688506994108 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179862197649 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735344013347 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.