In recent years Communication applications such as electronic mail, the number of messaging software like Whatsapp, Facebook messenger et cetera and Facebook which is social network have developed enormously. These applications build implications among people for making interaction but it doesn't devote connection with people. I partially agree that digital mechanisms evolved only for simplifying the conversation among people, it doesn't endow the robust relationship between people. This essay will denote the repercussion of digital communication as well as does it create a robust connection with people.
On the first hand, Advances in communication application is becoming widespread all over the world. This gives abundant features and communicates effectively with others without putting a lot of effort. Because everything is happening through the air which is technically named as a network. To exemplify, 10 years before most of the people had communication through the postal service. The technology has evolved and improved communication mechanism to the next level. According to the report which is unveiled by the popular news stated that 97.3% of people have been using communication software like Whatsapp, an immediate message delivery application.
On the flip side, although it has plenty of features to make people communicate effectively, it does not endow the strong relationship among people. Why I stating this information here?. Olden days many people meet others while playing, visiting the festival and attending marriage functions. But now most of the people chatting with others through the applications with one hand mobiles. As a result, people failed to make a robust relationship like before. In addition to that, many of us do not know who are close relatives and neighbors.
To recapitulate what I described briefly about communication and connection, communication does people communicate with each other but it will not create the platform to build the relationship in society.
- Digital Digital communication technology, such as email, instant messaging and social media, has improved communication and connection between people.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?Give reasons for your answers and include examp 84
- In the past people trusted what they saw in photographs Nowadays because of technology it is hard to trust the reality seen in photos Do you think this is a negative or positive development 82
- You have just spent a week with a friend on holiday. When you got home, you realised you had left your wallet there.. thank your friend for the holiday.. explain that you left your wallet in their house.. give them instructions of how to send it back to y 73
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as the saharadesert or the Antartic. What are the benefits and dis advantages for tourists who visit such places? 61
- People sleep less than before. Why? And what are the effects of this? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ng people for making interaction but it doesnt devote connection with people. I partia...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 434, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...fying the conversation among people, it doesnt endow the robust relationship between p...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 611, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...create a robust connection with people. On the first hand, Advances in communica...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: I_AM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I am'?
Suggestion: I am
...e strong relationship among people. Why I stating this information here?. Olden d...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, first, if, so, well, while, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64262295082 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13468000893 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577049180328 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5935083172 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.235294118 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9411764706 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11764705882 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254543452637 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784586924689 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612288836351 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159252063069 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684224485153 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.