Some individuals feel that working from home, while of benefit to employees, is actually a drawback for employers.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that working from home appears to bring many benefits for the workers but not the employers. in my opinion, employers can take full of advantages of working home as well
On the one hand, the spread of telecommunication technology – using the internet, mobile phones and tablet pc – has opened up a new range of possibilities for workers to carry on their tasks effectively and efficiently. By working from home, they can manage their time on their own and strike a balance between work and rest. For example, employees have no need to get up early in the morning to get to work, even though they could theoretically run business form their bedroom. Not only that, without the presence of immediate supervisors, or less distractions of coworkers, unimportant meetings and unnecessary interruptions, employees feel less stressful and more relaxing, stimulating. Those two factors both play a part in boosting their productivity and job satisfaction.
On the other hand, by allowing employees to work at home, employers can widen the base from which they recruit and boost the chances of capitalising on rich human capital. For instant, parents with childcare responsibilities and those with disabilities prefer to work at home. distance between their workplace and their place of residence has never ceased to be a disadvantage. Home working enables working people to perform their job at ease, and thus give employers more options in human resource use.
In conclusion, it is clear that working from home can bring potential benefits for employers as much as employees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-27 | Zarg'onishoh Axatov | 48 | view |
- Some individuals feel that working from home while of benefit to employees is actually a drawback for employers To what extent do you agree or disagree 48
- Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people. Some people think younger leaderwould be better.Do you agree or disagree. 56
- Studying abroad can be highly motivational for students and also inspire their dreams. Howewer, whilst studying abroad can have a number of positive effects on students, there are also many difficulties that they may meet a long the way. With this in mind 56
- Studying abroad can be highly motivational for students and also inspire their dreams Howewer whilst studying abroad can have a number of positive effects on students there are also many difficulties that they may meet a long the way With this in mind it 78
- With the increasing use and development of new technology, many machines are now able to do the work which people used to perform. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... for the workers but not the employers. in my opinion, employers can take full of ...
^^
Line 5, column 545, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun distractions is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...e presence of immediate supervisors, or less distractions of coworkers, unimportant ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 278, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Distance
...th disabilities prefer to work at home. distance between their workplace and their place...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20463320463 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01749740991 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602316602317 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6389111836 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.545454545 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216052527276 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096107845121 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884419388384 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175989484928 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720096181183 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.