Some people from poor and rural backgrounds find it difficult to get a university education. Universities have to make it easier, especially for such groups, to get into them.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, accepting in university become more difficult than the past, specially for poor families or countryside people. These persons almost disappointed from getting a university education. Some people believe that universities should provide easier condition for these people. Although, this solution may be have opponents, however I strongly agree with this plan for several reasons.
There are variety reasons for giving facilities by universities to poor families and people of countryside to get university education. Firstly, majority of universities in around the world receive high tuition fee for applicants, as poor families unable to pay this cost Consequently, they have deprived of educating, if university or the government do not consider facilities such as loan for them. Secondly, the level of education in rural areas is usually lower than big cities. One reason is that, since the live condition is very hard, and also distance of city centre is usually high, for this reason high quality of tutors have less attitude for going to these regions. Consequently, children cannot learn whole of requiring issues relative to university. Therefore, universities should consider few percent of quoting for rural residences.
However, critics of this idea argue that, some convenience such as giving quotes to community deprivers, is opposing of justice educating and believe that this facility should eliminate from university’s services.
To sum up, albeit, providing good condition by university in order to access easier poor families or rural residence to get university education may have be opponents, but in my view, it is a vital duty by university for accessing all people with low income or rural area to get a university education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | mohamadi654094 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mohamadi654094 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mohamadi654094 | 56 | view |
- alternative sources are better than fossil fuels. to what extend agree or disagree. 84
- alternative sources are more beneficial than fossil fuels.to what extend agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think that teenagers should follow what the old people say whereas some believe that it is good for teenage people to challenge what old people say.Discuss both opinions and give your opinion. 73
- Many criminals commit crimes after they were set free. Research indicates that the people who were convicted criminals would often commit crimes when they are set free. cauase and solve this issue? 67
- alternative sources are better than fossil fuels. agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dea argue that, some convenience such as giving quotes to community deprivers, is...
^^
Line 11, column 155, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ce to get university education may have be opponents, but in my view, it is a vita...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, such as, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53676470588 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97771422519 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.9420008954 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370906616458 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144365177034 0.084324248473 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0990064874966 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234237239256 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844470073523 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.