Some people from poor and rural backgrounds find it difficult to get a university education. Universities have to make it easier, especially for such groups, to get into them.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, accepting in university has become more difficult than the past, specially for poor families or countryside people. These persons almost disappointed from getting a university education. Some people believe that universities should provide easier condition for these families. Although, this solution may be have opponents, however I strongly agree with this plan for several reasons.
There are variety reasons in order to provide facility via universities for poor families and people of the countryside to get a university education. Firstly, majority of universities in around the world receive high tuition fee for applicants, so poor families unable to pay this cost Consequently, they have deprived of educating, if university or the government do not consider facilities such as loan for them. Secondly, the level of education in rural areas is usually lower than big cities. It is likely for being hard life condition in these regions, and also distance from city centre is usually high for this reason high quality of tutors have less attitude for going to these places. Consequently, children cannot learn whole of requiring issues relative to university. Therefore, universities should consider few percent of quoting for rural residences.
However, critics of this idea argue that, some convenience such as giving quote to the community deprivers, is opposing of educational justice and believe that this facility should eliminate from university services.
To sum up, albeit providing good condition at the university in order to access easier poor families or rural residence to get university education may have been opponents, but in my view, it is a vital duty which colleges should provide for accessing all people with low income or rural area to profit from academic education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | mohamadi654094 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mohamadi654094 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mohamadi654094 | 56 | view |
- The maps show the outskirts of the town of Fosbury in 1980 and 2015 81
- The graph shows the percentage of overweight men and women in Australia between 1980 and 2010. 56
- why people tend to buy brand's goods? do this have a positive or negative impacts? 73
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009. The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants. 67
- You recently broke your leg and your colleagues from work sent you get well cards and presents. Write a letter to them and say– Thank them for supporting you.– Describe how you spend your time.– Explain about your recovery process. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dea argue that, some convenience such as giving quote to the community deprivers,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, such as, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50177935943 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85644333037 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594306049822 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.0338036221 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.833333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351748203998 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137959764387 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836835550161 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219187642713 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745177497128 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.