Some people believe that Improving health care, education and pensions is the most urgent, while others believe that electing a constitutional assembly is more important. Which option do you prefer?
In these days people are discussing about the changes that Chile needs, some part of the country think that we have to make a new constitution, because ours stops any deep change of model. For other part is more urgent to modificate pension, education, or health care system because it incise in the daily lives of citizens.
The ones who think that change constitution of 1980 is the most urgent problem to solve argues that it works as a clipper for any deep changes, because when politicians try to do something else different than neoliberal public politics or laws, Constitutional Court resolve that is unconstitutional. For example, in 2018, the Constitutional Court said that article which declares illegal the profit on education system was not according to the constitution, so the court removes it of the legal order. They see in this case, how fundamental rule did not allow radical changes.
By other way a group think that the constitution is a piece of paper that does not matter so much because people on the streets are angry for not having anything to eat or for the absence of medical supplies, and argue that this problems are away from the lawyers’ discussions of the constitution. Furthermore, they sustain the thesis that changes can be done with our present constitution and if we do not have those laws is because there are not political willness. A good example of this is that criminal code has not been modified, although the elaboration of four projects by experts, it dates from 1874 and politicians never discuss a reform, despite constitution does not impede them.
As we can see, in Chile exist two visions about the relevance of a new constitution, one who think that our biggest problem is the constitution, and by the other hand, one who sustain that the real problem is the absence of political willness. However, we cannot deny the relevance of these two issues that are related between them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | Gillian Ord | 70 | view |
- Agree or disagree. The CHilean president should be impeached 90
- agree or disagree with the statement. The president should be impeached. 3
- Some people believe that Improving health care, education and pensions is the most urgent, while others believe that electing a constitutional assembly is more important. Which option do you prefer? 70
- Which of these forms of protest make the most impact: •Going on strike•Participating in marches•Disseminating information through social media 76
- Agree or disagreeImproving health care, education and pensions needs to be addressed most urgently in Chile 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'incises'?
Suggestion: incises
...ation, or health care system because it incise in the daily lives of citizens. Th...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...ians try to do something else different than neoliberal public politics or laws, Con...
^^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Court) must be used with a third-person verb: 'resolves'.
Suggestion: resolves
... politics or laws, Constitutional Court resolve that is unconstitutional. For example, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 225, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nce of medical supplies, and argue that this problems are away from the lawyers&apos...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 330.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91818181818 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82146436395 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539393939394 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.1344086022 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.6495813786 48.9658058833 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.3 100.406767564 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 20.6045352989 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129823831037 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521048496092 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05077256131 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0791241675936 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448546044523 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 11.7677419355 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.0537634409 151% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.247311828 185% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.