Educating people plays one of the most important part of every society. Authorities have to make it possible for every one, regardless of being rich or poor, villager or who live in cities, to train well. However, there are a couple of obstructions for some groups of individuals in a country to take part in scientific communities. Absolutely, universities are responsible for facilitating it for everyone to go to university.
First and foremost, monetary issues are the major reason for depriving many people, especially poor ones, to enroll in training academies. Many talents are keeping away from the educating facilities just because of money. This could be easily solved by allowances and financial supports which universities provide for applicants who deserve it.
Secondly, the other important reason for hindering people from getting into universities is the remoteness. This is more noticeable for person who live in suburban areas. In this regard, university principals have to prepare related requirements for such people. Preparing accommodations like dormitory and hostel is a practical way to meet this issue.
On the other hand, scientific academies are able to hold low-cost online courses which are accessible for everyone who interested in. This reasonable suggestion could easily resolve the problem of distance for every person who live in city or remote village.
To sum up, I strongly agree with this subject which universities account for depriving some people of education in high degrees. They can sort out this current by backing needy individual, as well as, providing facilities for students who live in places far from scientific communities, and holding virtual training courses.
- People spend a lot of money on various things as they earn more money nowadays than before Is it a positive or negative development 84
- Some people from poor and rural backgrounds find it difficult to get a university education. Universities have to make it easier, especially for such groups, to get into them.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44194756554 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96187675012 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625468164794 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1620894844 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207762050547 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764501498049 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671905711806 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117890627903 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551412372548 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.