In the past, buildings often reflected the culture of a society, but today all modern buildings look alike and cities around the world are becoming more and more similar
What do you think are the reasons for this?
Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
It is an indisputable fact that cultural values of a society are reflected by buildings in the past. However, nowadays people have a tendency to erect all modern building look similar as well as cities all over the world are becoming much the same. This essay will discuss the rationale behind this phenomenon, and I also think that it would be a both advantage and disadvantage effects.
Perhaps there are several reasons that related to architectural revolution and identifying the symbols of its country. Looking at the first idea, after the World War II, thank to developments of technologies of construction, modern architecture has become more and more popular to meet modern building requirements. This means it is no hard to find mega-structures like skyscrapers, pen-house, and apartment complex, etc. The second explanation is that associated with the principle, the appearance of a building must be typically designed for economical purposes by governments in order to recognize their culture. For example, France is prohibited to build very tall buildings in the heart of city to avoid spoiling the overall appearance of the skyline.
I hold belief that cities with the similar architecture can produce many beneficial and detrimental affects. With regard to positive impacts, cost-effective would be the strongest because the same modern building help people do not need to spend much time to create. Furthermore, these buildings are likely to be of aesthetic values, being strong and beautiful. Nevertheless, the negative effects should be taken into account since people might have a trouble for maintenance. Indeed, in order to repair a parts of buildings, they may destroy nearly overall system of it. In addition to, its building makes cities look boring due to having a familiar feels.
In conclusion, there are no real evidences showing that many buildings are not becoming increasingly similar, and I would argue that this development has not only benefit but also a potential cost.
- Technology has been largely integrated in education and in the future robots will even take the role of teachers To what extend do you agree or disagree 61
- Many people believe that the internet has made life much easier for most people. However, others fear that it might also represent a threatDiscuss both views and state your opinion 84
- Technology has been largely integrated in education and in the future robots will even take the role of teachers To what extend do you agree or disagree 61
- Many people keep pets.Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of keeping pets for individuals and for society? 78
- Drug abuse, is becoming increasingly common in the world today.What are some of the problems associated with drug abuse and what are some of the measures that can be taken to solve these problems? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: IT_IS_NO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'not' or 'now'?
Suggestion: not; now
...building requirements. This means it is no hard to find mega-structures like skysc...
^^
Line 9, column 505, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a part' or simply 'parts'?
Suggestion: a part; parts
...maintenance. Indeed, in order to repair a parts of buildings, they may destroy nearly o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.309375 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01584196111 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6125 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.359157735 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.266666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307446017545 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867712361515 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627294457069 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170568028202 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700362775345 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.