Nowadays, the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
In recent decades, It is true that the booming of the technological era has adjusted the method that people interrelate with others. Although this phenomenon creates some obviously benefits, I would argue that it is unwanted growth. In the following essay, I will present reasons to demonstrate my opinions.
Admittedly, living in a technology-driven world has influenced on means of interaction which leads to revolutionize the forms of connection between people and their partners. In particular, an abundance of residents has a tendency to engage with others via online platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, and Viber applications instead of face-to-face interact. For instance, relying on the advantages of technology, almost all people, especially youngsters can make a date with strangers by sending a message or an email and video calls without getting insight into their friends’ nature.
There are both benefits and drawbacks when it comes to the way that technology converted means of communication of people. In terms of its merits, it is obvious that such a change may discard the geographical barriers among citizens from different cultural backgrounds. For this reason, making friendship with others and chatting with the loved people would be limited by space or time, just need social media networking such as Facebook, Twitter or video conferencing which means that without meeting directly and only having digital devices. However, the disadvantages of this reality should not be bypassed. People, especially youngsters, firstly, are over-dependent on online communication based on technological equipment to wide a circle of friends. This is a key contributing factor behind pieces of carelessness when they decide to start a new relationship, which leads to the fact that they might feel vulnerable and alienate from other social members, thus weakening sense of community and suffering from mental issues.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the effect of technology on the relations of people with others is undeniable. Nevertheless, this tendency also causes unavoidable drawbacks which dominate its positives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Ngochai | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Harrynguyen1980 | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Garrett | 84 | view |
- In the modern world, it is no longer necessary to use animals for food, clothing or medicine. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- In some countries children have very strict rules of behavior, in other countries, they are allowed to do almost anything they want. To what extent should children have to follow rules? 73
- What are the benefits and disadvantages of tourists who visit other places? 89
- In some countries children have very strict rules of behavior, in other countries, they are allowed to do almost anything they want. To what extent should children have to follow rules? 73
- More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering computing and medicines.some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people rich countries are stealing from poor 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55657492355 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17842209141 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623853211009 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.461820934 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.785714286 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226826269959 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676816988007 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490540480747 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129099086312 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217540059513 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.