A report for university lectureer show how money was spent on different form of entertainment
The graph below illustrates the entertainment expense of various types from 1995 to 2000 on three main areas.
Overall, it is obviously that the money consumed for entertainment increase remarkably overtime in all regions for all forms.
There was a dramatic growth in the spent fun money in United State from 184 billion dollars to 257 billion dollars in five-year period. The amount of spending in United States was also double the figure for Europe, in either 1995 or 2000. In Asia, the spending was at least among all areas, but still experienced a double increase to 100 billion dollars in 2000.
In term of different forms of entertainment, the publishing moderately occupied the highest expense, following by the television. However, in comparison with the amount of money spent in United States and Asia, which witnessed a significant increase by 50 billion dollars, the quantity in Europe went up slightly by approximately 15 billion dollars. The expenditure of cinema, video and music were less fluctuated, which maintained the amount of about 10, 20 and 35 billion dollars respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | Sái Đức Lộc | 78 | view |
- The internet has greatly increased our access to information. To what extent do you think this is a good thing? 67
- Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be 73
- Report for a university lecturer 11
- Most people try to balance between their work and other parts of their lives. Unfortunately, not many achieve this balance. What are the reasons for this and what can be done to solve this. 61
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 32.9175257732 6% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 26.3917525773 129% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 937.175257732 99% => OK
No of words: 178.0 206.0 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2191011236 4.54256449028 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89022421896 2.54303337028 114% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 127.690721649 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606741573034 0.622605031667 97% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 290.88556701 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.9022030995 44.8134815571 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.125 76.5299724578 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 16.8248392259 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 4.34317383033 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173299141419 0.216113520407 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733232886794 0.0766984524023 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04635101281 0.0603063233224 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0997997145118 0.12726935374 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438135838026 0.0580467560999 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 8.37731958763 171% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 70.7449484536 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 7.45979381443 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 8.71597938144 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 7.59969072165 116% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 41.2886597938 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.