Countries around the world will be facing significant challenges relating not only to the environment, but population and education as well.
What problems will your country face in the next ten years?
How can these problems be overcome?
Modern times are jeopardizing the world with numerous existential threats. Problems like climate emergency, food deficit, lower minimal wages, and overpopulation can cause real damage to the developing countries in the coming decade. Public awareness, better management practices and equal division of resources can make the difference.
Being an underdeveloped country, with less stable economic condition Pakistan is on the verge of various environmental, social and cultural threats. In the next few years two main challenges for the country are; food crisis, and declining literacy rate. Increasing global temperature is a serious danger to regional food crops. The average crop yield is decreasing at a faster rate. This would ultimately reduce food availability. Secondly, the lacking interest of parents in educating children is lowering the literacy rate. The reasons are lower salaries and expensive education. According to the latest survey, the literacy rate has declined to 42% in 2019 from 48% in 2014.
In order to overcome these problems, there are few solutions suggested by the policymakers and analysts. Firstly, better farming practices through modern equipment can increase crop yield. This involves well-managed use of fertilizers and pesticides. However, Countrymen should be aware of the climate crisis and trained to make farming environmentally sustainable. Secondly, the State should introduce free basic education policy by building more public institutes. This will not only raise the literacy rate, but also impact positively on the overall social development of new generations.
In conclusion, in the upcoming decade, food emergency and poor literacy rates can cause damage to countries like Pakistan. Whereas, nations can tackle these problems by efficient farming strategies and by introducing free elementary education policy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | Wajeeha Umer | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | Lưu Thị Hoài Thu | 89 | view |
- Once children start school, teachers have more influence on their intellectual and social development than parents.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- You recently returned by plane from an overseas trip. When you reached home, you realised you had left your hand luggage on the plane. Write a letter to the airline. In your letter:•say when and where you lost your hand luggage•describe the bag and 89
- Should private schools receive government funding?Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 73
- You have seen an advertisement in an Australian magazine for someone to live with a family for six months and look after their six year old child. Write a letter to the parents. In your letter explain why you would like the jobgive details of why you woul 67
- In Britain when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. sometimes the government have to pay for this care. who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 593, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... social development of new generations. In conclusion, in the upcoming decade, f...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ucing free elementary education policy.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85766423358 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98833578778 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653284671533 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5382916617 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4736842105 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4210526316 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73684210526 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181491373766 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043697010455 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397707284876 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107574363233 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249788132197 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.89 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.12 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.