Some people think that advertising aimed at children should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Social media nowadays is developing significantly not only the content creativity but also how it comes to us. Advertising is a part of social media and advertising aimed at children is existing many on there. Some people say that advertise for children should be banned on media. However, some people claim that it should not be banned for many reasons. From my point of view, advertise that children is its target should not present on TV too many.
Firstly, advertising for children on media usually for selling items such as toys, movie disks and sweets. That products are illegal and advertisements is a tool for companies to increase their profit by selling them more. However, some people or companies who want to take these children immaturity for selling things that are toxic or prohibited. Children who don't have much knowledge and experiences are the victims of these evil people, all for their commercial benefits despite the social morality. Secondly, children are incapable of paying money for what they want and their parents give payment for that bill. Because of the curiosity of the kids, they can buy anything through the contact that the advertisements give and their parents will be socked for how much money they need to pay for what their kids choose. Thirdly, watching to many advertisements won't help their children to develop any skill or knowledge.
On the other hand, advertisements that aim to kids some time take the advantages. For instance, some advertisements has very impressive content that bring to the kids acknowledge and make them concentrate in that adverts. So parents can keep their off-springs rest for meal. Moreover, families can purchase a good bargain through advertisements, such as sale clothes, toys and food.
In conclusion, although adverts for kids had some advantages, the bad perspective of that kind of adverts is much bigger and it cannot be controlled all of the time by parents. Because of that reasons, advertising aimed at children should be avoid.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Niusha | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lydunhien | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | longpm2k | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | torontoontario | 84 | view |
- A few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or a negative development? 73
- As parts of education students should spend a period of time living in another country to learn its language and culture To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Today many people do not realize how important the natural world is Why is this How can people learn more about the importance of the natural world 73
- Task 1 The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 80
- Some people think that advertising aimed at children should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t are toxic or prohibited. Children who dont have much knowledge and experiences are...
^^^^
Line 5, column 47, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'kid'.
Suggestion: kid
... other hand, advertisements that aim to kids some time take the advantages. For exam...
^^^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...much bigger and it cannot be controlled all of the time by parents. Because of that reason...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'avoided'?
Suggestion: avoided
...advertising aimed at children should be avoid.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, as to, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09063444109 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79277643622 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522658610272 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.671459872 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6111111111 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3888888889 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255227756949 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106608554753 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098571051736 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182817803277 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817841712552 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.