some people argue that we should do research into their family history. Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations. discuss both views and give your opinion?
There is controversial that whether we should dig inside our ancestors’ origin or prioritize present and future value. While the majority holds the view that we need to put our family history in consideration/launch investigation into our family history , I would argue that it is much better to focus on present and future of our offspring.
On the one hand, there are variety of reasons why we ought to do a research into our family origin. Firstly, this research enable us to have a throughout inside into our ancestor background . If we discover our forefather’s legacy, we will take pride in our ancestor’s achievements and sacrifices . As a result, that is not only a great way to foster our offspring about patriotism and but also help us to feel connected to the past. Secondly, we can avoid consanguine marriage when being well-equipped with our ancestor’s origin. Consanguine marriage is known as a taboo in most countries, which leaves a various adverse effects on both physical and mental health.
On the other hand, I would argue that it is much better to prioritize present and future generation rather than focus on researching family background. First of all, doing researches related to history’s origin has brought no relevant values for the present and future. Since the information gained from those researches are decadent and can not be applied into practice. additional, there is no guarantee of the accuracy of information or data gained through individual research. As the majority of researches is carried out by individuals without any confirmation from high authority,the possibility of accurate information is very low, which trigger the misunderstanding among people. Futhermore, overhead cost to carry out researches are exorbitant, so we will have to squander a great amount of money on impractical research.
To sum up, the attitude towards researching family should be adjusted depend on the reality but there is also exist parallel negative sides that we need to take into consideration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | litoniub | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | vuphuonglinh1996 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | AnCourses | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | quynhan1995 | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ch investigation into our family history , I would argue that it is much better to...
^^
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...e variety of reasons why we ought to do a research into our family origin. Firstly, this r...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...hout inside into our ancestor background . If we discover our forefather's le...
^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...estor's achievements and sacrifices . As a result, that is not only a great w...
^^
Line 5, column 638, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...untries, which leaves a various adverse effects on both physical and mental health. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 378, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Additional
...t and can not be applied into practice. additional, there is no guarantee of the accuracy ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 591, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...out any confirmation from high authority,the possibility of accurate information is ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 111, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...depend on the reality but there is also exist parallel negative sides that we need to...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, as a result, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31901840491 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3068400198 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567484662577 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1988946902 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.6 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275682242377 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917776845796 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642579614899 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172510666111 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427029681043 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.