The two pie charts below show the amount of annual spending by governments in Italy and Spain in 1990.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
These pie chart gave the information of yearly expenditure by goverment for various main fields in two countries, namely Italy and Spain in 1990.
It is obviously clear that higher education constituted the higher proportion than that the other fields. The lowest proportion of government budget was Environment, which was similar in the both countries.
Spain goverment spent 45% for the higher education, 10% was higher than that the figure for Italy. While the proportion of transportation was 16% in Italy, it was solely 6% in Spain. The proportion of environmental services was similarly lowest in both countries, with 4% of Italy and 5% of Spain respectively.
The proportion of K-12 education and Health/ Human Resources in yearly government’s budget in Spain was 20% for both areas. While the figure for K-12 education was 25%, Health/ Human Resources was 14% in Italy. Yearly budget in both countries spent the lowest proportion for Other area was similarly the same, 6% of Italy and 4% of Spain respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | dieulinh1310 | 56 | view |
- The two pie charts below show the amount of annual spending by governments in Italy and Spain in 1990.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The two pie charts below show the amount of annual spending by governments in Italy and Spain in 1990. 56
- The two pie charts below show the amount of annual spending by governments in Italy and Spain in 1990. 73
- Financial education should be a compulsory component of the school program. 22
- The two pie charts below show the amount of annual spending by governments in Italy and Spain in 1990. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22289156627 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0072552227 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457831325301 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.751685049 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22222222222 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106803289848 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583917984739 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727918402708 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961218693512 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092393896478 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.