Some people believe that to improve driving standards it is better for drivers to take road safety courses; others think that strict punishment is more effective.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Carrying Out driving standards have been considerably investigated by police. Yet, there is still little understanding of which method is more efficient when it comes to making drivers abiding those standards. While some people side with the importance of safety classes, others and I stand for strict punishment for it.
Firstly, providing courses for teaching drivers to observe the regulations and laws could be undoubtedly costly. In other words, the government, as the main responsible in this matter, must construct institutions and classes to meet the demand for implementing this method. This, also, include pedagogical experts, class's instruments, staff and etc. needed. Moreover, it seems highly unlikely to gather drivers who are driving for years and teach them how to drive. An obvious reason for this is that they firmly believe that they have learned everything about driving through experience. Even If the police be able to oblige them to take the courses, they won't accept what they would be thought in those classes. The barriers which exist in this regard make it impossible to happen and being executed, though.
Additionally, setting the punishment for driving crimes has been evaluated as an effective deterrent over the years. These punishments range from a simple fine to imprisonment the one who commits the crime. In fact, most people normally escape from being arrested by the police and undergo any kind of punishment. This might be because of human instinct or running from inconveniences in life. The only matter of concern in this regard would be conveying the ratified laws and raise awareness of them to the drivers. I strongly stand to the point that if the drivers are aware of the laws and the punishments, they won't breaking them and observe them as a high priority.
To draw a vivid conclusion, providing courses to teach drivers how to drive safely could be not only costly but also ineffective, though passing law to punish inconsiderate drivers could be more efficient and less costly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | mrezabarfi | 89 | view |
- completing university education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job on the other hand other people think that getting experience and developing soft skills is more important discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- Some employers offer their employees subsidised memebership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so.Consider the arguments from both aspects 78
- Teenagers should not be allowed to use mobile phones at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Demand for food is increasing worldwide.What is the cause of this?What measures can the international community take to make sure the supply of food is enough? 73
- Fast food is now universally available in most countries and is becoming increasingly popular. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while other do not. What about your opinions on this? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ical experts, classs instruments, staff and etc. needed. Moreover, it seems highly unlik...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, still, while, in fact, kind of, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7473754067 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60303030303 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7917183798 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.941176471 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4117647059 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182410034602 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575265928397 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581709818597 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124593764346 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631263870215 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.